In a provocative statement that is already stirring debate in Karnataka’s political circles, MLA Munirathna has claimed that Kusuma DK remains by his side and declared that “if DK Ravi were alive, I would not have gone to jail.”
The Remark & Its Context
During a media interaction, Munirathna alleged that Kusuma DK — widely understood to refer to Kusuma Hanumantharayappa, widow of former IAS officer DK Ravi — continues to support him in his political and legal struggles. He went further, asserting that had DK Ravi been alive today, he would never have been imprisoned, implying that Ravi’s support or influence would have shielded him from legal troubles.
Though specific details of what “jail” he is referring to were not clarified in the statement, the claim is being interpreted as a reference to prior cases and controversies that Munirathna has faced.
Background & Political Rivalries
Munirathna has often been at odds — publicly and politically — with the DK family (DK Shivakumar and DK Suresh), and has previously accused their associates of manipulating political narratives in his constituency.
Kusuma Hanumantharayappa, the widow of DK Ravi, contested elections and holds considerable esteem among some Congress circles. Her support to any political figure, especially one in rivalry to the DK siblings, is bound to generate strong reactions.
Munirathna himself has been embroiled in controversies, including casteist remarks cases, bail proceedings, and accusations of misuse of power.
Reactions & Ripples
Political analysts suggest that the remark is designed to stoke emotion, reinforce alliances, and project strength in the face of legal and political setbacks. Some observers view it as an attempt to assert moral or symbolic backing from the DK Ravi legacy — even in absence.
Opposition leaders, especially from Congress and DK-affiliated circles, are likely to condemn the claim as a political fabrication. They may demand clarification, retraction, or legal accountability for making such statements.
The remark could further intensify factionalism within Karnataka politics, particularly in the Bengaluru region where Munirathna, the DK family, and Kusuma operate in overlapping spheres of influence.
What’s Next
- Whether Munirathna will be asked to substantiate his claim — e.g., with documents or witnesses —
- How Kusuma will respond to being publicly linked in this manner
- Whether this escalates existing legal or political tensions
- Media and public reaction in Bengaluru and across Karnataka
As the fallout continues, one thing is clear: the symbolic weight of DK Ravi’s legacy has once again become a contested terrain in Karnataka’s political discourse.
